LBi Netrank: online brand positioning [link:LBi Netrank Home Page]
Home  |  About Us  |  Working With You  |  Our Services  |  Our News  |  Blog  |  Contact Us

Search



Archive


Tag Cloud

acquisitions antitrust ask at-t christmas citizendium geographic google international language marketing nofollow online advertising redirects spam supplemental trends webmaster wikipedia yahoo!


Subscribe

If you would like to be alerted when someone posts to the blog please enter your email address below.




RSS 2.0 Feed

Blog RSS feed

Google goes green

Posted on 17th December 2007 at 11:11 am by Manley

Google has declared its goal to provide renewable energy which is cheaper than coal.

Is this philanthropy, marketing spin or just good business sense?

Google has issued a press release outlining its new strategic initiative to develop electricity from renewable energy sources that will be cheaper than electricity produced from coal.

Google.org, Google's philanthropic wing, discusses the motives and the methods that it is looking to use to achieve this, including partnerships with esolar and makanipower. Google.org has also been providing updates on the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change in Bali and is very hot on climate change, but Google is a company with shareholders. Google is only talking about hundreds of millions, whereas the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation has an asset fund approaching forty billion dollars, but that is coming from private individuals, predominantly the Gates and Warren Buffett, not from shareholders.

Now I am not suggesting that this is not good publicity for Google, because clearly it is, but I don't think it is fair to accuse the company of being socially conscious simply as an exercise in spin. Equally though, I cannot imagine any board convincing shareholders of a purely philanthropic enterprise.

Whatever the motives, I feel that Google's stance is extremely laudable, but what could Google's motives be? Where is the commercial advantage in a renewable fuel which is cheaper than coal? I mean, after all, would anyone really want to buy that?

File under: google

Permalink

Comments

No-one has commented so far, or all comments are awaiting moderation.

Post Your Comment

Name*:

Email* (will never be shown):

Website:

Comment*:

Subscribe

If you would like to be alerted when there are new comments to read please enter your email address below.

RSS 2.0 Feed

Comments RSS feed


« Red Monday. Google finally tackle Bloggers spam comment issues »
CONTACT US | TERMS & CONDITIONS | SITE MAP
©LBi Netrank. All rights reserved 2000-2008